🔗 Share this article

The resident Tomas Anez Dos Santos worked in a small glade far in the Peruvian rainforest when he detected footsteps coming closer through the dense forest.

He realized that he stood surrounded, and halted.

“A single individual was standing, directing with an bow and arrow,” he remembers. “Unexpectedly he noticed I was here and I started to escape.”

He had come confronting members of the Mashco Piro. Over many years, Tomas—residing in the modest community of Nueva Oceania—had been practically a neighbor to these itinerant people, who reject contact with strangers.

A new document from a rights group indicates there are a minimum of 196 termed “remote communities” left in the world. The Mashco Piro is considered to be the most numerous. The report states 50% of these communities may be eliminated in the next decade should administrations don't do additional actions to defend them.

It claims the most significant threats stem from timber harvesting, digging or exploration for crude. Remote communities are highly at risk to basic disease—as such, the study states a threat is caused by exposure with proselytizers and online personalities looking for engagement.

In recent times, the Mashco Piro have been coming to Nueva Oceania increasingly, according to inhabitants.

This settlement is a angling community of seven or eight families, sitting elevated on the shores of the Tauhamanu waterway in the center of the of Peru rainforest, half a day from the most accessible settlement by canoe.

The area is not designated as a protected reserve for uncontacted groups, and logging companies function here.

According to Tomas that, on occasion, the noise of logging machinery can be heard continuously, and the Mashco Piro people are witnessing their jungle disturbed and destroyed.

Among the locals, inhabitants report they are divided. They dread the Mashco Piro's arrows but they hold deep regard for their “kin” residing in the woodland and wish to defend them.

“Permit them to live as they live, we can't change their way of life. That's why we preserve our separation,” states Tomas.

Inhabitants in Nueva Oceania are worried about the damage to the community's way of life, the threat of violence and the possibility that deforestation crews might expose the tribe to diseases they have no defense to.

During a visit in the village, the group made their presence felt again. A young mother, a resident with a toddler daughter, was in the jungle gathering fruit when she noticed them.

“There were calls, shouts from people, a large number of them. As though there were a crowd calling out,” she shared with us.

It was the initial occasion she had met the tribe and she escaped. An hour later, her head was continually throbbing from terror.

“As there are loggers and firms destroying the jungle they are escaping, maybe due to terror and they come close to us,” she explained. “It is unclear how they might react towards us. That is the thing that frightens me.”

In 2022, two loggers were assaulted by the tribe while catching fish. A single person was wounded by an bow to the stomach. He lived, but the second individual was found dead after several days with several puncture marks in his frame.

Authorities in Peru maintains a strategy of non-contact with secluded communities, rendering it prohibited to commence contact with them.

The strategy originated in the neighboring country following many years of campaigning by tribal advocacy organizations, who saw that early interaction with isolated people lead to entire groups being eliminated by disease, destitution and malnutrition.

During the 1980s, when the Nahau tribe in Peru came into contact with the broader society, 50% of their community died within a short period. A decade later, the Muruhanua people faced the identical outcome.

“Secluded communities are highly at risk—epidemiologically, any exposure could introduce diseases, and including the basic infections may decimate them,” states an advocate from a tribal support group. “Culturally too, any contact or intrusion may be very harmful to their existence and survival as a community.”

For those living nearby of {